Ace the Civic Literacy Challenge 2025 – Unlock Your Citizen Superpower!

The decision in West Virginia v. Barnette (1943) is indeed based on the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. This case involved the refusal of students to salute the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance due to their religious beliefs as Jehovah's Witnesses. The Supreme Court ruled that the state could not compel students to participate in patriotic rituals that violated their religious convictions, emphasizing the importance of protecting individual rights to free exercise of religion.

This ruling is significant because it reinforced the principle that the government cannot interfere with personal religious beliefs and practices, highlighting a core aspect of the free exercise clause. The court recognized that forcing individuals to act against their religious beliefs not only infringes on their freedom but also undermines the diverse fabric of society.

Other cases listed do not primarily deal with the free exercise clause; for example, Engel v. Vitale addresses the establishment clause by ruling against state-sponsored school prayers, while Miranda v. Arizona concerns the rights of individuals in police custody, and Furman v. Georgia focuses on the death penalty and cruel and unusual punishment. Thus, the context of West Virginia v. Barnette solidifies its connection to the free exercise clause.